Superintendentsâ€™ Attitudes toward Public Education in North Carolina
Keywords:School superintendents, educational policies
AbstractThis study examined the perceptions of North Carolinaâ€™s school superintendents related to current educational issues. A total of 67 superintendents (64% return rate) responded to an online survey about national and state educational concerns. In general, the superintendents do not believe that some of the recent statutes, policies, and educational initiatives will serve to improve schools or student learning. They indicated that the most significant priorities that need to be addressed were teacher morale, inadequate funding, and teacher pay; and, that the primary purpose of teacher evaluation should be to help teachers improve their ability to teach and that it should be based on student performance. Almost all superintendents did not want to use armed security guards or arm teachers and/or principals to ensure safe schools. They believe that the increase in charter schools and tuition support for students to attend private schools will hurt school systems, but online courses for earning high school credit were supported. Most superintendents reported that high-states testing has had mixed results on improving education; and, they did not believe that the cost of testing was worth the money spent. All superintendents wanted more local control of the school calendar. They also reported that the Common Core State Standards would improve education in North Carolina.
This Agreement (the Agreement) is made by and between __________(Author(s)) and "JAEPR" (the Journal)). Author Agreement By submitting this research article entitled "_____________" ('article') to (JAEPR) published by the J. Murrey Atkins Library at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, the Author(s) certify that: I. Warranties: A. Author __________(name) is legally authorized and possesses full power and authority on behalf of my co-authors [list names] to enter into this Agreement. B. Author warrants, on behalf of all article authors, that:a. the article is original, has not been formally published in any other peer-reviewed journal, is not under consideration for publication by any other journal and does not infringe any existing copyright or any other third party rights;b. The named authors (above) are the sole author(s) of the article. Any co-author not signing this Agreement personally has granted full authority to [named author in I.A.] to enter into this agreement of his/her behalf and to grant the following rights to JAEPR set forth below.c. the article contains nothing that is unlawful, libellous, or which would, if published, constitute a breach of contract.II.CopyrightAuthors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: a. Author(s) shall retain copyright to the article but grant the Journal right of first publication, and the irrevocable right to perpetually disseminate the article as part of the Journal subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License, that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.b. Beginning one year after the date of formal publication of the article, Authors may enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work and subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), subject to a proper acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal: â€œThis article was originally published in the Dialog (Vol., Issue, Year). III. Indemnification. Author shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the Journal from any and all claims, liabilities, damages, expenses (including attorneys fees and expert costs, penalties, fees, if any arising from enforcement of this Agreement and/or related to claims of infringement of copyrights or proprietary rights allegedly contained in the Article , or resulting from a claim of defamation, obscenity, or invasion of privacy based upon or arising out of the publication of the Article or any other breach of warranty as set forth in No. 1.