Historical Roots in Positioning Chinese International Students in the US: Race and Culture from 1872-1949
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55370/dsj.v9i2.1828Abstract
Chinese international students (CIS) have been entangled in a complex narrative of anti-Asian sentiments that dates back to their early interactions in the United States. Yet, a lack of research has focused on the historical roots and racial dynamics of CIS have encountered. This study will focus on the first two waves (1872-1949) to examine CIS experiences, history, and roots of anti-Chinese sentiment. Positioning theory is used as the conceptual lens to examine how CIS located themselves and were positioned by others, delineating duties, rights, expectations, and obligations in the first two waves. Critical discourse analysis serves as the methodology, allowing an in-depth analysis of textual language to uncover patterns of dominance, and power dynamics, and identify the inclusion and exclusion based on language use. The findings contribute insights into the historical aspects of anti-Chinese sentiment, elucidating the multifaceted positionings of CIS within the American socio-cultural landscape.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).