On the
Margins: LGBTQ Youth in American Schools
A
Commentary
Katie E.
Brown
The
University of North Carolina at Charlotte
The
authors featured in this volume of Urban
Education Research and Policy Annuals address the needs and perspectives of
populations who are often marginalized by public schools: students and teachers
of color, English language learners, and parents in urban communities. These
authors shed light on the differential treatment that members of these groups often receive in public school settings and propose
ways that educators can better serve these populations. In so doing, the
authors in this volume are contributing to an extensive body of literature that
describes and prescribes education for low-income students, students of color,
and urban students and families.
In
recent years, scholarship has emerged to suggest the marginalization of another
group of students in American public schools: sexual minority and gender
non-conforming youth. Often referred to by the acronym LGBTQ (lesbian, gay,
bisexual, transgender, and queer), these students are conservatively estimated
to comprise approximately five percent of the American middle and high school population,
or one million students (Cianciotto & Cahill, 2012).
Given
the historic marginalization and discrimination LGBTQ individuals have faced in
the United States, it is perhaps not surprising that these patterns of
exclusion are mirrored in schools. Homosexuality was classified as a mental illness
by the American Psychological Association until 1973, and was a criminal
offense in many states until the Supreme Court ruled anti-sodomy laws
unconstitutional in 2003 (Bryant, 2008). Recent court rulings have made
marriage equality more widespread (American Civil Liberties Union, n.d.), but
LGBTQ people continue to face discrimination in the workplace: no federal law
currently exists to protect LGBTQ individuals from discrimination (Human Rights
Campaign, 2014), and LGBTQ people on average earn less than their heterosexual,
cisgendered peers (American Psychological Association, n.d.). Although public
opinion has shifted in recent years in favor of allowing same-sex marriage, a
recent study suggests that homophobia continues to be more widespread than
surveys indicate (Franke-Ruta, 2013).
It is
important to note also that schools have historically played a role in
socializing students into normative gender roles and heterosexual relationships.
Whether consciously or not, teachers begin to reinforce behaviors along
gendered lines as early as preschool (Cahill & Adams, 1997). Horn (2007)
points out that in later years, students also police each otherÕs gender
expression. School dress codes have long prescribed gender-specific notions of
appropriate appearance (Smith, 2012). Mayo (2014) describes how rituals like
school dances work to affirm and perpetuate heteronormativity.
The
recently released 2013 National School Climate Survey, conducted biennially by
the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network, provides insight into the
school experiences of American LGBTQ youth (Kosciw, Gretaky, Palmer, &
Boesen, 2014). While this most recent edition of the survey does indicate that
schooling conditions for LGBTQ youth have improved somewhat since the inaugural
survey in 2001, many of the statistics are still cause for alarm. Homophobic
and transphobic language remains pervasive in American schools; over two-thirds
of LGBTQ students surveyed reported hearing homophobic remarks frequently at
school, and over half had heard them from teachers or other school staff. Physical safety is a concern as well;
almost one-third of LGBTQ students reported that they had skipped school in the
last month due to feeling unsafe at school, while 36% had experienced physical
harassment at school within the last year. The vast majority of these students
could not see themselves reflected in school curricula
or access any LGBTQ-related information through their school library. While the
presence of a school Gay-Straight Alliance, or GSA, was found to be a
protective factor, only about half of students reported that their school had one
(Kosciw et al., 2014). Overall, the results of this survey suggest that schools
are still not welcoming and safe places for sexual minority and gender
non-conforming youth in the United States.
The
National School Climate Survey serves as a reminder that discussions about
school equity and inclusivity must include sexual orientation and gender
expression as well as race, class, language, and culture. As several authors
have pointed out, homophobia and constricting definitions of gender harm all students by limiting their
self-expression, not just those who identify as LGBTQ (Horn & Nucci, 2003;
Wyss, 2004; Horn, 2007; Mayo, 2014). Making schools into safe places for LGBTQ
youth will contribute to the larger project of making schools safe for
everyone.
References
American
Civil Liberties Union. (n.d.). LGBT relationships. Retrieved from
https://www.aclu.org/lgbt-rights/lgbt-relationships
American Psychological Association
(n.d.). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender
persons and socioeconomic status. Retrieved from
http://www.apa.org/pi/ses/resources/publications/factsheet-lgbt.pdf.
Bryant,
K. (2008). In defense of gay children? ÔProgayÕ homophobia and the production of homonormativity. Sexualities, 11(4),
455-475.
Cahill,
B., & Adams, E. (1997). An exploratory study of early
childhood teachersÕ attitudes toward gender roles. Sex Roles, 36(7), 517-529.
Cianciotto,
J., & Cahill, S. (2012). LGBT youth in AmericaÕs schools. Ann Arbor, MI: University
of Michigan Press.
Franke-Ruta, G. (2013, October 8). Surveys dramatically underestimate homophobia. The Atlantic. Retrieved from
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2013/10/surveys-dramatically-underestimate-homophobia/280335/
Horn, S.
S. (2007). AdolescentsÕ acceptance of same-sex peers based on
sexual orientation and gender expression. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 36(3),
363-371.
Horn,
S. S., & Nucci, L. (2003). The
multidimensionality of adolescentsÕ beliefs about and attitudes toward gay and
lesbian peers in school. Equity and Excellence in Education, 36(2), 136-147.
Human
Rights Campaign. (2014). Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Retrieved from
http://www.hrc.org/resources/entry/employment-non-discrimination-act
Kosciw,
J. G., Greytak, E. A., Palmer, N. A., & Boesen, M. J. (2014). The 2013
National School Climate Survey: The experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual and
transgender youth in our nationÕs schools. New York: GLSEN.
Mayo, C.
(2014). LGBTQ youth and education:
Policies and practices. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Smith, N. (2012).
Eliminating gender stereotypes in public school dress codes: The necessity of
respecting personal preference. Journal Of Law & Education, 41(1), 251-259.
Wyss,
S. E. (2004). ÔThis was my hellÕ: The violence experienced by
gender non-conforming youth in US high schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies
in Education, 17(5), 709-730.