Separate but Unequal: Common Educational Policies
and Practices that Separate African American Students from Mainstream Learning
Environments
A Forward
By, Marcia Watson
Sixty
years after the landmark Brown v. Board
of Education (1954) case, school segregation still continues to
systematically manifest within public schools. School tracking, homogenous
district zoning, and school property tax laws are only a few of the separatist
methods used within 21st century learning environments (Beese & Liang, 2010; Darling-Hammond, 2010; Kim, Losen, & Hewitt, 2010; Kozol,
2005; Lewis, Butler, Bonner, and Joubert, 2010; Mickleson, 2001). Mickleson
(2001) found that within Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, African American
students were disproportionately tracked in lower-level classes. Furthermore,
within this same urban district, nearly 25 percent of low-income schools or
schools servicing primarily African American students had fewer human and
material resources (2001). In addition, school property tax laws have also been
found to racially exclude students from essential material resources. Besse and Liang (2010) and Darling-Hammond (2010) found
that in comparison to other industrialized nations, the United States is
currently disproportionately allocating more funds to suburban or affluent
schools. Through these structural impediments, most public schools still fail
to be holistically integrated. Despite over six decades of proverbial
desegregation, true integration is still suggestively a utopian ideal for urban
students..
Yet,
there is one additional exclusionary practice that has reached substantial
national attention within the last two decades – school discipline. Some
of the most striking policies that remain arbitrarily ignored are school
discipline policies and discipline reform. In 2014, President Obama mirrored
the sentiments of U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, and urged school
districts to revisit their punitive discipline policies (Goldfarb, 2014). This
is one of the most paramount issues of student separation, because many
suspended or expelled students are extracted from mainstream learning
environments and fail to receive adequate instruction (Kim, Losen,
& Hewitt, 2010; Souza, 2005). Researchers have recently researched how
discipline policies specifically impact students on the basis of race. Jawanza Kunjufu (2002) and Lewis,
Butler, Bonner, and Joubert (2010) found that African
American students, specifically African American males, were disproportionately
suspended from school, which resulted in missed instructional time. These
policies have direct racial implications due to the noticeable differences in suspension rates between racial groups. For example, in
2012 one in six African American students were suspended; with some local
districts reportedly as high as sixty-six percent (Schott Foundation, 2012).
When considering African American students only comprise sixteen percent of the
total public school population, these statistics are startling (Schott
Foundation, 2012). In addition, in all but one state, African Americans
outnumber their White counterparts in school suspensions and expulsions (Schott
Foundation, 2014). These school policies inadvertently cultivate environments
of exclusion and isolation (Kim, Losen, & Hewitt,
2010; Kunjufu, 2002; Lewis et. al, 2010).
This
second volume of the Urban Education
Research and Policy Annuals examines how topics of separation, segregation,
marginality, and dissonance are still key issues within school settings. Each
of the articles featured in this volume explores topics of segregation, similar
to the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case.
The highlighted findings of each of these articles suggest that segregation
– in its varying forms – is still a valid topic of discussion
within education.
References
Beese, J. & Liang, X.
(2010). Do resources matter? PISA science achievement
comparisons
between students in the United
States, Canada and Finland. Improving Schools, 13(3), p. 266-279. doi: 10.1177/1365480210390554
Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to
equity will determine our future. New York: Teachers College Press.
Goldfarb, Z.A. (2014,
February 11). President Obama to launch major new effort to help
minority young men. The Washington
Post. Retrieved from
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/president-obama-to-launch-major-new-effort-on-young-men-of-color/2014/02/11/cc0f0a98-92cd-11e3-b227-12a45d109e03_story.html.
Kim, C.Y., Losen, D.J., & Hewitt, D.T. (2010). The school-to-prison pipeline.
New
York: New York University Press.
Kozol, J. (2005). The shame of the nation: The restoration of
apartheid schooling in America. New York: Crown Publishers.
Kunjufu, J. (2002). Black Students Middle Class Teachers. Chicago: African American
Images.
Lewis,
C.W., Butler, B.R., Bonner, F.A., & Joubert, M.
(2010). African American male
discipline patterns and school district responses
resulting impact on academic
achievement: Implications for urban educators and
policy makers. Journal of African
American Males in Education, 1(1), 1-19.
Mickelson, R. (2001). Subverting Swann: First and second
generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg
Schools. American
Educational Research Journal, 38, 215-252.
Schott Foundation for Public Education. (2012). The Urgency of Now. Retrieved
from http://blackboysreport.org/urgency-of-now.pdf
Souza, T.J. (2005). The communication of caring: An analysis
of at-risk students in an
alternative school. Journal of the Northwest Communication
Association (34), 1460-1495.
Bio: Marcia J. Watson attended Mercer
University in Macon, Georgia, where she received her B.S. in Middle Grades
Education. After her undergraduate studies, she worked for Atlanta Public
Schools as an alternative middle school teacher. While working for Atlanta Public
Schools, she received her M.Ed. in Educational Leadership from Georgia State
University in Atlanta, Georgia. Marcia is currently an Urban Education doctoral
student at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. Her research
interests include: Afrocentricity, alternative
education, and discipline policy reform. Marcia can be contacted at mwatso35@uncc.edu.